首页> 外文OA文献 >Water and Bromide Recovery in Wick and Pan Lysimeters under Conventional and Zero Tillage
【2h】

Water and Bromide Recovery in Wick and Pan Lysimeters under Conventional and Zero Tillage

机译:传统和免耕下的灯芯和泛泡计中水和溴的回收率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Quantifying in situ solute transport through soils and the landscape has been widely acknowledged as important and yet challenging. The objective of this study was to evaluate water and bromide movement in no-tilled (NT) and conventionally tilled (CT) corn using two different types of in situ lysimeters—pan and capillary wick— for single rainfall events. Four zero-tension pan and four capillary-wick lysimeters were installed 1.2 m deep on opposite sides of four soil pits. Two were under NT corn, and two were under CT corn. Bromide (Br) was either surface applied or applied with an initial 25 to 27 mm of irrigation (33 to 34 g Br m2). A total of 120 to 147 mm of irrigation was applied continuously at 8.8 mm h-1. Leachate was collected on 15 min intervals for 24 h and on greater intervals for up to 350 h. Lysimeter discharge and Br concentration were determined for each interval. After drainage began and until rainfall was discontinued, the water drainage rate was, on average, greater in NT (7.2 mm h-1) than in CT (5.6 mm h-1) based on results from the pan lysimeters. By contrast, the water drainage rate for the wick lysimeters was, on average, greater in CT (7.3 mm h-1) than in NT (3.0 mm h-1). The wick lysimeter appears to have behaved as a sink under the CT conditions, likely representing water flow in smaller channels. Under NT conditions, greater discharge observed with the pan lysimeter implicates the response from larger channels as the conduit for water flow. Flow-weighted mean Br concentration was less when Br was applied on the soil surface (17.9 mg L-1) than when Br was applied with the irrigation water (50.6 mg L-1). Implications from preferential flow studies are often determined based on a single method of evaluation for solute transport, which are likely subject to the limitation of the method used. This study illustrates that contrary to the conventional understanding about preferential flow in NT, water flow and Br transport to the 1.2-m depth was as great as or greater with CT than with NT based on the results from the wick lysimeters for single rainfall events.
机译:定量分析通过土壤和景观的原位溶质运输已被认为是重要且具有挑战性的。这项研究的目的是使用两种不同类型的原位溶度计(平移和毛细芯)评估一次降雨事件中非倾斜(NT)和常规耕作(CT)玉米中水和溴化物的运动。在四个土坑的相对两侧,以1.2 m深安装了四个零张力锅和四个毛细管芯渗漏仪。其中两个位于NT玉米下,两个位于CT玉米下。可以对溴化物(Br)进行表面处理,也可以进行25至27 mm的初始灌溉(33至34 g Br m2)。在8.8 mm h-1的条件下连续进行120至147 mm的灌溉。每隔15分钟收集一次渗滤液,持续24小时,然后每隔350分钟收集一次。确定每个间隔的血渗量测定仪放电和Br浓度。在开始排水之后,直到停止降雨为止,根据全蒸渗仪的结果,NT(7.2 mm h-1)的平均排水速率大于CT(5.6 mm h-1)的排水速率。相比之下,CT机芯(7.3 mmh-1)的芯吸力计的排水速率平均要比NT(3.0mmh-1)大。吸液式测渗仪在CT条件下似乎像一个水槽,可能代表较小通道中的水流。在NT条件下,用泛函仪观察到更大的排放量暗示了较大通道作为水流导管的响应。当在土壤表面施用Br(17.9 mg L-1)时,流量加权平均Br浓度要比使用灌溉水施用Br(50.6 mg L-1)时小。优先流动研究的含义通常基于溶质运移的单一评估方法确定,这很可能会受到所用方法的限制。这项研究表明,与传统的关于NT中优先流动的认识相反,基于单次降雨事件的芯吸式测湿仪的结果,CT的水流量和Br输送到NT的程度大于或等于NT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号